top of page

Does the highest value of binding energy of the nuclide refers to the highest stability ?

It is supposed that the binding energy B.E. explain the easy of formation; nucleosynthesis or nucleogenesis, and the degree of the stability of the nuclide, but it seems not. The well-known statement “the energy liberated in the formation of nucleus from its componence nucleon is a measure of stability of that nucleus” is incorrect. In other words, the higher the value of B.E, does not mean the higher the stable nuclide is. The B.E calculation gives higher energies values to unstable nuclides that belong to Z=1-99 rather than to stable nuclides. For example, both the 8Be and 218U nuclides have the highest B.E among Be and U isotopes respectively. Most of the unstable nuclides have the highest values of B.E.


Fermions Structure and Mass Quantization in Astrophysics
The structure of the fermion particles and their antiparticles grows hierarchically from these high gravity circular closed quantized packages rings of magnetic dipoles under drastic circumstances in stars. This process starts when a huge numbers of magnetons m-1 and antimagnetons m+1 compacting under strong self-nuclear forces SSNF (strong charged electromagnetic force SCEF and self-gravity force SGF) as circular closed quantized package ring. The superposition of these quantized circular rings causes the formation of the first quantized mass fermion, i.e. the electron of quantized mass with unitary elementary negative charge (outside the nucleus). These quantized mass circular rings then merge further into a
continuous hierarchy to form the larger unstable massive nuclear particles with partial quantized mass such as muon, pions, kaons and eta mesons then reaching the stable quantized mass fermion, such as the proton and the neutron (in stable isotopes only) then passing to heavier unstable particles like tau etc.

Standard Energy of Formation of Nuclide

NMT proposed a standard energy of formation of nuclide, SEFN, (nucleosynthesis) in thestars as a new concept which is based on neutron mass quantization. As explained previously, the protons and the electrons are stable with fixed mass outside the nuclei and the atoms in the normal circumstances

Does Nuclear forces include gravitomagnetic field?

Self-Nuclear Forces and Unified Field-

Gravitomagnetic Field: The high dense magneton m-1 and its antimagneton m+1 inside the fermion will create high gravity circular closed quantized packages rings of magnetic dipoles in the form of matrices. These two spinning-rotating magnetons create a Strong Charged Electromagnetic Force (SCEF) field of long range due to their own extraordinarily strong magnetic constant (μb=24.65μo)

What is the Fermions Structure and Mass Quantization ?

The structure of the fermion particles and their antiparticles grows hierarchically from these high gravity circular closed quantized packages rings of magnetic dipoles under drastic circumstances in stars. This process starts when a huge numbers of magnetons m-1 and antimagnetons m+1 compacting under SSNF (SCEF and SGF) as circular closed quantized package ring

Mass-Energy Conformity Principle E=mbc 

The momentum of the magneton inside the fermion due to its rotation is given by p=mb. Theamount of the energy, SSNF, generated is expressed by E=mbc based on Mass-Energy Conformity Principle. This principle has three criteria which discuss the concept of the energy of the moving system which conforms to its moving mass

SHORT ESSAYS

Is the Photon Real ?

The energy of electromagnetic spectra is emitted as pulses which are represented by their frequencies as discrete packets. Thus, these discrete packets of energy are still waveform in nature and Professor Bahjat Muhyedeen says "I call each of these discrete packets of energy frequentons to differentiate them from discrete packets of photons which are of particle nature". The same thing can be said for gamma rays and all other rays of the electromagnetic spectrum, which are emitted from nuclear energy levels as energy quanta frequentons

Is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle correct ?

Since, the uncertainty of Heisenberg (Heisenberg, 1927) is based on the deflection of the electron by photon in Compton’s effect, therefore this principle become less accurate because of incorrect concept of the particular behavior of the photon since it does not have a mass and it
does has a momentum.

Does Radiation have Mass ?

Most scientists predict that the body loses some of its weight after radiation. Max Planck in1907 reported after a deep investigation that "The inertia mass of body is altered by absorptionor emission of heat energy.

bottom of page